@davisbenjamin you know what, I think this was more a design issue rather than the stats issue. Our stats box is really big right now so it might confuse people to think that this number is more important than what editors provide or they might not even see the editors provided data cause it’s in smaller font (we had a magazine reach out to us recently saying that their acceptance rate is not accurate and they’re afraid authors will perceive the magazine differently because of a very high acceptance rate) I think in our new design the tracker stats are a bit lower on the page and not as big, so maybe with a proper disclaimer we can make it work